Mythbusters Moon Landing photo hoax 1

Mythbusters Moon Landing photo hoax 1

Tags: hoax, landing, Moon, Mythbusters, photo
Posted in Moon landing on February 27th, 2010 by RoswellUFOs.com

Debunking "Multiple light sources" myth.

Popularity: 82% [?]

26 Comments »

You may also be interested in...
No related posts

26 Responses to “Mythbusters Moon Landing photo hoax 1”

NewDirection4us Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 10:54 am
The evidence points to the fact that the photos and video were staged on Earth. No huge dust cloud when the lander approaches the moon surface. NO STARS in the photos. Film in 1969 is not usable at 250 degrees, the temperature of the moon's surface. Astronots don't have as much bounce as someone in 1/6 Earth's gravity should have. Different angles of shadows from supposedly one Sun and no artificial lighting, Van Allen radiation belt, the list goes on.
SpreadingtheMuse Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 11:41 am
"obvious to everyone"

Then we should have heard this from a professional engineer at the time, not have to wait to hear it from a non-engineer non-expert 40 years too little and too late.
SpreadingtheMuse Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 12:33 pm
All the hoax nuts agree.
Getting any professional photographer to agree is another matter entirely. : /
NewDirection4us Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 12:43 pm
But we ALL agree that the photos and video were NOT shot on the moon.
ytmoog Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 12:55 pm
Shadows from satellites will always show to be parallel.
This is because of perspective.
Because the camera is looking directly down from above.

In the case of this image the camera is looking from the side.
Which is where perspective alters the apparent angle.

Here is a good example;
myimgs. net / images / zstpn. jpg
All those posts are vertical, the bridge is flat. But those shadows are not parallel!
Because of perspective.
tinman842 Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 12:57 pm
it sure is funny the new jap satalite pics and video of the moon surface closest fly by ever.. u clearly see all valleys and mountains and hills craters etc.. and low and behold all shadows in video are PARALLEL…. go see for ur self.. thats live footage from satalite… somesones a LIAR… LOOKS LIKE MYTHBUSTER GOT IT WRONG.. BIG TIME.
tubeshok Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 1:05 pm
How Stanley Kubrick
Faked the Apollo Moon Landings:
Or How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Lies.

By
Jay Weidner

Sacred Mysteries Productions: JFK made his famous speech asking NASA to land a man on the moon before the decade was out. Many insiders believed that this was a ploy by JFK to get NASA, and the secret government, to release their saucer technologies. Since it was obvious to everyone that standard rocket technology could not get man to the moon and back
SpreadingtheMuse Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 1:15 pm
"Area 51"

But what about all the selfless "truther" heroes who SWEAR it was filmed on the Hawaiian Lava Fields?
Wait, it was the Craters of the Moon National Monument.
WAIT, a Hollywood studio.
No? Good thing you're hear to tell all those idiots how dumb they are, and how YOU figured it out.
We hope all you screw-ups can eventually come up with a consistent story. If you cant agree even amongst yourselves, there's no reason we should agree with you either.
ytmoog Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 1:35 pm
No, it has nothing to do with 'reflected' light. It is down to 'perspective' and the 'terrain'.
Here is a good example:
watch?v=u4Ay3tUi68E
Shadows from the sun being very non-parallel.

Multiple lights means multiple shadows, for which there are none.
If you don't know what 'perspective' is I suggest you look it up.
NewDirection4us Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 1:48 pm
The pictures were took in Area 51.
NewDirection4us Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 2:11 pm
YTmoog: If has nothing to do with reflective light causing the different shadow angles then there is only one other explanation and that is more than one light source; multiple spotlights!
chrishove123 Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 2:25 pm
Yea but the CIA are in the pay of the Russians. Everyone knows that. It's no secret
nasafakedit Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 2:29 pm
Mythbusters semi retards
nasafakedit Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 3:08 pm
CIA does all the murders
nasafakedit Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 3:44 pm
PROOF NASA FAKED IT

"Given today's knowledge and today's understanding of radiation protection, to put someone out in that type of environment would violate the current requirements that NASA has."

".. Cosmic rays are so dangerous and so poorly understood.."

The report, commissioned by NASA's Exploration Systems Mission Directorate

If Nasa cannot protect astronauts now how the hell did they do it 40 years ago???
chrishove123 Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 4:10 pm
@ alkabash66 ERRRRR to educate people who don't think it happened. Anyway you might as well say the same thing about the hoaxers. Why are they all going on and on. Is it because they have doubts and are not so sure it didn't happen. Your argument is so easy to turn back onto itself it's pathetic
chrishove123 Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 4:44 pm
I suppose it was the Russians who killed Kennedy and had John Lennon shot as well according to them
dings215 Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 4:52 pm
hollow? made of green cheese too, I suppose.
ytmoog Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 5:21 pm
This is nothing to do with 'reflections', it is to do with 'perspective' and 'terrain'.
LupusAries Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 5:57 pm
sides if you look closely the ground is not flat on the foto and the Lens looks like a wideangle, and remeber a hasselblad is a middleformat camera, so the Focal length gets longer in short you need a longer lens than on the Small pictures camera. so i recon there is a certain degree of distortion made by the lens. Oh and sides the bumps in the ground DO CAST THEIR OWN SHADOW! Wich makes the shadow apear non parallel. anyone with an inkling about photography should know this to be true.
LupusAries Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 6:35 pm
you know there is another explanation, it could be the optics too. because most optics do sometimes curve a line a bit, if you have ever been processing Photos on a PC you know this. And this optic must´ve had quite a broad Focal length spectrum since i imagine its quite hard to change that Lens on the moon. And the optics of those times, even hasselblads weren´t as advanced as they were, especially if this was shot with wideangle lens, then you have those curving lines.
NewDirection4us Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 7:11 pm
You could have shadows at different angles IF some of the light was being reflected off of giant mirrors, but, not reflected off of a hillside as NASA and these guys are saying. There would also have to be an obstruction blocking the original light source on to the secondary objects. The secondary shadow would not be nearly as strong since the reflected light would be the only light causing the second object to have a shadow.
ddd14r Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
GTFO
loperspest Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 8:11 pm
@nasafakedit
Look up at the sky some time instead of spamming youtube.
The moon. Is grey.
The idea that NASA would, or even could, somehow hide 'the moon's color ' is beyond idiotic and bordering on psychotic.
Good night.
nasafakedit Says:
February 27th, 2010 at 8:30 pm
Myhtbusters are Morons

Nasa Paid Propaganda Whores

Fake science for 10 year olds
Mike Says:
March 13th, 2010 at 11:04 pm
Why go to all this trouble to fake it….. when we can just GO TO THE MOON AND DO IT FOR REAL.

case closed.

I believe that governments cover up a lot of things. I believe governments are corrupt, but this is rediculous. The truth of scientologists and mormons and all of the power they hold cant be kept a secret, how can something as silly as one person on their deathbed going on youtube saying: "yeah, we didnt actually get to the moon" one of the thousands of thousands of people at NASA or their families not come out?